Chrysler Corporation

Warren Stamping Plant

 

 

Die Preventive Maintenance Program

An Overview

Presentor: Tom Ulrich, PM Facilitator

Subject: It Pays to Maintain Tooling Too.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Introduction While I realize that this presentation is likely being made to equipment maintenance people, I do know that many of you would like to stop the damage being done to your presses and such by junk tools - specifically dies that produce sheet metal parts. The prevailing attitude of our industry is to run tooling to failure; fix it as best you can; and run to the next failure. I’ve been to many seminars, such as these we are attending this week, and I’ve never met a presentor that felt that tooling should be systematically, preventively or predictibly maintained. I am here to change their mind.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Warren Stamping Plant

 

General Warren Stamping Plant (WSP) is the smallest of Chrysler’s three "stand-alone" stamping facilities - and the most profitable. Because you have been buying all those Grand Cherokees and Dodge Ram Pickups and the brand new Dakotas, WSP has decided to genuflect at the truck market altar and devote itself to stamping sheet metal components for those wonderful, wonderful trucks.

 

WSP also builds many of the dies which are run in our presses. The construction and installation of our facilities are performed by the appropriate Warren Stamping employees. In short, we keep our people busy. And trained. Ten years ago, you could hire in on Friday and start on Monday with a five minute training period administered by your boss. Today, every employee receives a week-long introduction and instruction on working for Chrysler’s WSP.

 

 

Statistics To set the scope of this project for you, let me do some advertising by way of plant statistics:

    • Warren Stamping Plant was built in 1948;
    • 63 acre site (43 acres under roof);
    • that is 1.8 Million square feet of floor space;
    • 19 major press lines;
    • 18 major assembly lines;
    • Annual sales in excess of $600 million.
    • 1,700 tons of steel disbursement - daily;
    • 23,000 major assemblies produced - daily
    • 2526 hourly employees
    • 213 salary employees

 

Employee Profile Two of the more important statistics are: Average employee age of 46.3 and an average seniority of 20.2 years. These are not the statistics you really want when you are trying to change the way you do business. Older, high-seniority employees tend to be set in their ways and sceptical of any and all new-fangled ideas. And that includes management personnel as well as those who actually do the work. At least that is what we found at WSP.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

How It Used To Be In the beginning, prior to 1992, there was chaos. 20+% of the dies were sent to the repair areas after every die set. Most were returned to line without attention. I worked as a die troubleshooter during part of this time and came to know the traveling welder better than anyone else. I knew him and I knew all about his family. I cried with him when his son died and celebrated with him when his daughter married. Just the sort of relationship you develop with someone you see two to three times a day.

 

Almost every inch of trim edge was hot-sheared (that’s what we call turning the press over after applying red-hot weld to a worn trim steel). Screw holes were stripped, dowels were broken or loose and you prayed that, today, you would be running a panel that allowed a low threshold of quality. Every week featured a broken die replete with boiler plate mounts and one or two "dutchmen" to hold the pieces together. Plus, management expected sufficient production to satisfy the assembly plants. This nightmare was screaming for a dream. It wasn’t going to be possible overnight or over several nights.

______________________________________________________________________________

It’s the Process Back in 1992, when involved in a series of meetings conducted by Harbour and Associates (Troy, MI) and while investigating and discussing the possibility of preventive maintenance (PM) procedures for tool and dies, representatives from Chrysler’s three (3) main stamping facilities came to the conclusion that maintaining tooling was not going to be effective until and unless the supporting equipment was subject to a routine PM program. Conversely, the maintenance departments insisted that their efforts were hampered by the sorry state of the tooling that ran in their presses. Come the Dawn, we realized that the tools, presses, automation, etc. were part of a process - and the process was completely out of control.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Jim Clancy Fortunately, General Plants Manager James Clancy recognized the benefits of a radical restructuring of the maintenance function (I hesitate to call it a process). His sponsorship of the Joint Die Maintenance Committee was vital to its success and to the acceptance of any and all changes to the die repair methods at all three stamping plants. It is important to note that each Chrysler plant is free to accept or reject the recommendations of such committees as the Joint Die Maintenance Committee. Your proposal must be proven and backed up with case histories or it’s dead in the water - regardless of the number of man-hours already spent. Sponsorship by someone of the stature of Mr. Clancy only guarantees a serious look-see by the various plant management teams. The program itself must perform.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Warren Stamping Being a thrifty plant in a thrifty company, the Warren Stamping Die PM

PM Committee Committee moved very cautiously and tested every theory and practice. Tonnage monitors from Helm, Inc. (Detroit, MI) were installed on specific presses; exact die location was established to ensure repeatibility of set-up; common die shut heights were enforced to reduce run-to-run times and eliminate variability; press downtime was carefully recorded as a measure of effectiveness; and Failure Mode Analysis sheets were designed that could be used by tradespeople and their supervisors to identify and track problems caused by the dies. All this was accomplished over a period of time - a long period of time.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

What We Needed Working together with our consultants and with the other stamping plants, a plan of attack was formulated and scrapped and formulated and scrapped and formulated again. Forms were designed, procedures defined and standards were set - for a single set of dies. Slow work bringing one set of tools under control. Critical to our success was implementing a regular schedule of PMs for the stamping presses in that press line. After press PM was initiated and after gathering information for a few months, we had the basic data to warrant expansion to include all the tools from that same production line. As you can see, this was not a fast process for us.

 

One major component of the program had to be the collection, storage and analysis of pertinent data. To accomplish this, we needed a CMMS system that was designed to our specific criteria. The University of Michigan Engineering Department proved to be very helpful in this regard. For a donation of $50K, they sent a pair of PhDs out to identify the requirements and develop the software.

 

Not only did this solve our problems and analyse our data, it became the model upon which we based the Total Maintenance System (TMS) database which is shared by all Chrysler facilities.TMS now allows us to track die repairs by production counts (output) and to identify problem dies and presses in the system. For the Purchasing people, it lists all the purchased parts for every die and provides a total quantity needed. We are working on a consumption rate. Just as with equipment, tooling PM needs the services provided by a credible CMMS.

______________________________________________________________________________

CMMS While it is apparent that a computerized system can help control the maintenance process for equipment, experience will also prove that tools need to be monitored and analyzed in much the same way. Machinery is made of components that wear and fail at a quasi-predictible rate. If a motor fails too soon, find the root cause for the early failure and correct it. If a trim edge deteriorates and throws a burr, why shouldn’t it? There is no rate of deterioration that can be figured mathematically. At least not yet.

 

The reason for this is that each and every die is absolutely unique. This may be why many feel a tool should be run to failure. I admit that you can make a good case for that line of reasoning but, it’s the easy way out. Just as motor bearing failure is predicted and anticipated based on past history - many identical motors running at prescribed rates in dozens of applications - so too the tool can be anticipated to fail based on accummulated data. The difference being that the data is only accummulated from day 1 of the tool’s particular life. Thus, it is extremely important that data collection, monitoring and analysis begin when the tool is being built and during "try-out". Every repair event for every die is recorded in a CMMS.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Blueprint Books At Warren Stamping, critical, wear-able components are recorded in, what we call, a "blueprint book". Final sizes of wear plates; nitro cylinder pressures; surface treatments (i.e.: chrome plating); company ordering codes; major tooling coordinates; hole locations; are all recorded for reference. These recorded items provide a "as good as new" size reference as well as give the skilled tradesperson a handy listing when they have need to re-order any and all components. The hole reference picture, which is attached to the "blueprint booklet", gives a visual ID of the hole and lists the appropriate punch and button used to produce that hole.

 

At 400K hit schedules and at 800K hits , previous PM checklists and these books are used to evaluate the die and its components relative to their ability to perform at peak efficiency while providing world-class parts. The booklet is the cheapest, most efficient way to put pertinent information into the hands of those workers who need it most.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Implementation

 

Pre-Roll Out Now that we have data collected on the CMMS; blueprint books; proven PM checklists; a past history of tool improvement; and some confidence in our program’s ability to save time and money: WSP asked for our program needs. What do we need to roll out the plan? Well. That’s easy. Just ask the tradespeople.

 

Needs To get them to talk, we bribed them with new work benches that had lots of drawers. They responded. We ordered, for every area: die separators; Lamina drills; large, level set-up plates; drill presses; cut-off saws; tool grinders; welders; and all appropriate health and safety devices.

 

(Relief) We eliminate: transportation problems by freeing up the cranes; long waits for access to drilling equipment; and improperly fit trim sections. We increase: the trades people’s ability to modify details and improve die functionality. We keep: the health and safety of our employees as a number one concern. When this stuff comes in, we’ll be on our way.

 

Roll-Out Three old blanking presses were removed to get us the floor space we needed for the new PM Areas. A spot for each die was painted on the floor (each die now had a "home") in close proximity to its assigned PM Area. Die makers can retrieve their own dies without waiting for delivery from some remote location. In fact, most dies that are tagged for repair or listed for a PM proceedure, are opened and set up in the work area prior to being stored at their home site. Anything to expedite the process.

 

Cleanliness is next to godliness and, since god’s name was constantly being invoked in some capacity in the press room, we installed a second steam booth to clean dies. Cleaning is a basic PM function that was constantly ignored because of lack of time and overcrowding of the single booth. Today, that second booth is in constant use and the dies have never run better. Dirty dies, as you may suspect, are my pet peeve. I firmly believe that you can, literally, wash most of your problems down the drain.

 

And, finally, the "Roll-Out" included a fundamental change. Every die maker became a PM die maker. There was no distinction between PM and repair. If a die came into the area for PM and you found something needing repair or replacement, you did it. If it came in for repair, you looked for a PM checklist and, if it was close to a cycle procedure, you did that. If a die was scheduled for an engineering change, even though we still maintain a die room for new construction, the PM die maker made the change.

 

I feel compelled to add here, that, in my opinion, the trades people embraced these major changes and guaranteed the success of the program because they were included in making many decisions relative to the change. They do appreciate the value of keeping tools in working order.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Our PM Program Before I show you some of the forms and documents we use, let me summarize the program itself:

    • Cycle-Based (on 50,000 or 100,000 hit schedule)
    • Standard proceedures for each level
    • Unique checklists for each tool
    • Recording of every repair occurrence
    • Feedback from tradespeople relative to condition of tool
    • Prompt notification when a problem is ID’d during a PM
    • Periodic review of each tool
    • Adjustment of schedule based on performance and accumulated data
    • Two full-time employees administer the program

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Forms

 

FMA Our own version. We identify and locate any problems encountered during a production run.

See attachments A & B

 

Common Checklist Every new tool that enters the program is assigned a generic checklist depending on the "type" of die it is. (i.e.: trim; form; draw). This was drawn up in Excel© spreadsheet software.

See attachments C, D & E

 

Unique Checklist At 400,000 hits, each die is reviewed and assigned a cycle of 50,000 or 100,000 hits based on performance measured by previous checklists, repair incidents and empirical evidence. As a result, a unique checklist is produced by the TMS and used thereafter for each cycle procedure.

See attachment F

 

Blueprint Book This booklet has undegone many revisions - each time we find a new use or need. It contains basic information like punch and button sizes and order numbers for wear plates, guide pins and bushings, nitro cylinder pressures, etc. This booklet is also referred to at the 400,000 hit level to reference size (to determine wear) and quantity of components. It has a sheet to record the master tooling coordinates of each major detail - facilitating the production of cutter paths for machining the detail to original specs. It also has a hole reference guide to facilitate punch replacement.

See attachments G, H & I

 

Repair Summary Produced by the TMS to assist in the evaluation process. Pick a time span and every repair incident for any particular tool will be displayed/printed for handy reference. An indispensible tool.

See attachment J

______________________________________________________________________________

 

So What? WSP has a fine PM program that is supported by management as well as by the trades. There is a CMMS in place to administer the process. WSP can demonstrate compliance with one of the four major components of the new Chrysler Operating System as well as with a major portion of the QS9000 standards of operation. So What?

 

Rewards There is, really, only two reasons for a company to operate: money; and more money. Our PM program fills both of these needs.

 

 

$$ Since inception in 1992, the PM program has helped provide cost avoidance money to the tune of $30,997,440.00. That’s 485 average monthly hours of die downtime (1996) compared to 1379 average monthly hours of die downtime (1992). Figured at an average cost of $1128.00 per hour of production downtime.

See attachment K

 

$$$$$ What we get to add to our benefits is this: Reliability. Because of the dramatic increase in tool reliability; the resultant improvement in productivity; coupled with a decline in rework: WSP management has been able to add more than enough sub-assembly lines to absorb the reduction in bodies needed to populate the production process.

See attachment L

 

Pudding There are some qualifications to all this. I don’t want to mis-lead anyone. During this same time span, WSP has replaced 12 (of 26) old press lines with 6 new lines - 4 transfer presses and 2 tandem lines. We have "grown out" of most dies that pre-dated the PM program. We have, indeed, benefitted from modernization and from the new product introductions that are typical of the auto industry.

 

However, I do have a "control group" to prove our process: In late 1993, Chrysler introduced the popular "Grand Cherokee©" (ZJ) model of our Jeep© line of SUVs. The ZJ dies completely populated two new transfer presses and these two lines became completely autonomous from our normal production process. They resisted the PM process, opting to repair and maintain on their own. Like it or not, I had a "control group".

 

In January of 1996, ZJ die performance (for dies assigned to the transfer lines) was so poor compared to their ZJ brethren that ran in other, older lines that we were instructed to begin the process of inluding these ZJ dies in our PM program. This chart should indicate that every die should be part of a PM program from day one of its existence. These dies consistently perform above the plant average of die-related production downtime.

See attachment M.

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Conclusion I believe that the evidence is irrefutable. Tooling must receive the same treatment as equipment. Maintain, maintain, maintain. Any PM process that centers on tooling must, by nature, provide for the uniqueness of the tool while considering the common wear-able elements shared by many such tools. Each tool has elemental functions that must be considered for maintenance: Alignment; Guidance; and Basic Activity. Maintain the components of each function and you maintain the tool.

 

Persistence One word of encouragement and the road to success: Persistence. Never, ever give up. If you do, you fail. If you don’t, you win. I don’t have the time to tell you all the war stories related to our campaign. There are many.

 

Mandatory I will tell you what you must have. You must have top management

Elements support. You must have an advocate who presses the benefits and celebrates the successes on a daily basis with supervisory and management personnel. You must have capable, dedicated staff - taken from the ranks so they know the need and can recognize improvement. You must include your tradespeople in some part of the planning process so they can take ownership of the PM program. You must buy whatever tools the workforce needs to facilitate the maintenance process. You must buy a bigger wheelbarrow to cart the savings to the bank.

 

Persistence That’s right. With a capital P.

 

 
This site designed and maintained by PM Web Design
Copyright 1998 - 2006 Tom Ulrich - DIE PM
Send questions or comment to info@pmwebdesign.com